mbirth/ninty-codes
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

Update checksum calculation and make it work for B and C codes.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Markus Birth 2020-02-24 14:05:09 +01:00
parent d8a2664830
commit a30ce98607
Signed by: mbirth
GPG Key ID: A9928D7A098C3A9A
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
ninty-codes.py
View File

@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ def safe2real(code: str):
code = code.replace('Y', 'O') # O might be confused with 0
return code
def generateChecksum(base_code):
def generateChecksum(base_code, base = 30):
if len(base_code) != 15:
raise RuntimeError("Bad argument to checksum")
# Mystery/bug: Why is this ord('7') in particular? 55, 0o55 and 0x55 are all unrelated to anything in base 33. The check looks like it's trying to do c - 'A', but does the weirdest thing instead.
cksum = reduce(lambda cksum, c: (cksum + (ord(c) - ord('0') if ord(c) <= ord('9') else ord(c) - ord('7'))) % 33, base_code, 0)
# https://www.reddit.com/r/SwitchHacks/comments/f7psrk/anatomy_of_an_eshop_card_code/fijt5d4/
cksum = sum(int(c, base) for c in base_code) % base
return CHARSET[cksum]
def validate(code):
@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ def validate(code):
# Make uppercase if necessary, then change X and Y back to their base 33 equivalents
unmangled_code = safe2real(code)
theirs = unmangled_code[15]
mine = generateChecksum(unmangled_code[0:15])
code_type = get_type(code)
base = 33 if code_type == '_A_' else 30
mine = generateChecksum(unmangled_code[0:15], base)
return theirs == mine
def parse(code):
@ -173,7 +175,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
seen_chars[code_type] = set()
for c in s[1:]:
seen_chars[code_type].add(c)
if code_type == '_A_':
if code_type != 'NUM':
valid = validate(s)
print('{} {}'.format(s, "☑ " if valid else "☒ "), end='')
if not valid: